And just like that, a response from senator Ron Johson's office:
Dear Brandon,
Thank
you
for
contacting
me
regarding
net
neutrality.
Since
the
Clinton
administration,
the
Federal
Communications
Commission
(FCC)
had
regulated
the
broadband
industry
with
a
light
touch,
allowing
the
Internet
to
flourish.
Unfortunately,
the
Obama
administration’s
decision
to
reclassify
broadband
service
under
Title
II
—
its
misnamed
“Open
Internet
Order”
—
broke
with
bipartisan
tradition.
This
reclassification
imposed
heavy-handed
utility-style
regulations
on
internet
services
and
led
to
greater
government
control
of
the
Internet.
This
heavy-handed
regulation
has
caused
investment
in
Internet
infrastructure
to
decline.
According
to
the
FCC,
among
the
nation’s
12
largest
internet
service
providers,
domestic
broadband
capital
expenditures
decreased
by
5.6
percent,
or
$3.6
billion,
between
2014
and
2016.
As
the
new
chairman
of
the
FCC
recently
explained,
“regulations
designed
for
monopoly
will
push
the
market
further
toward
monopoly.”
This
is
not
what
is
best
for
citizens
of
Wisconsin
or
the
rest
of
the
country.
One
of
my
top
priorities
is
to
ensure
the
expansion
of
high-speed
broadband
throughout
Wisconsin.
On
May
18,
2017,
the
FCC
released
a
Notice
of
Proposed
Rulemaking
for
broadband
services
that
was
a
welcome
development.
This
action
restores
the
light-touch
regulation
that
allowed
for
a
free
and
open
Internet
for
nearly
20
years.
Thank
you
again
for
contacting
my
office.
It
is
very
helpful
to
hear
the
views
of
the
constituents
I
serve.
Please
see
my
website
at
www.ronjohnson.senate.gov for
additional
information.
It
is
an
honor
representing
you
and
all
the
people
of
Wisconsin.
Sincerely,
Ron
Johnson
United
States
Senator
I used this "free and open" internet that supposedly existed for nearly 20 years. I remember Netflix performing extremely poorly on my Time Warner Cable connection due to TWC refusing to enter into any kind of peering agreement.
Netflix eventually had to pay to make it happen. This effectively resulted in TWC double dipping, they charged me over $50 / mo. for a connection that was more than capable of handling an HD Netflix stream, and they charged Netflix for being able to more efficiently deliver content to TWC customers. Basically overnight my connection was "capable" of Netflix. I certainly don't see how small competitors to Netflix could ever afford to enter such an agreement, and without financial incentive, I certainly don't see TWC helping them out or otherwise improving their infrastructure to better handle the load.
During the same "free and open" period, I spent plenty of time on the phone with various ISPs arguing that I was not getting the speed I paid so exorbitantly for. The response was always the same, rated speeds are 'up to', and you are not guaranteed to ever actually receive the rated speed. Interestingly, they would always "look into it" once I complained that I'm only getting speeds that don't exceed the lower speed tiers and suggested I would like to change to a cheaper plan. Every time, speeds would return (for a while). What motivation did they have to solve my problem anyway? They knew I maybe had one other option to buy my internet access from, in some cases I had none. I fail to see how the market could be pushed "further toward monopoly". And that decrease in capital investment?
The ISPs themselves don't blame net neutrality, and in many cases investment has increased.
Much like the current debate around "healthcare" has little to with healthcare and has everything to do with insurance (just because I can afford insurance does not mean I can afford healthcare, and if I can't afford healthcare, do I really have
access to healthcare?), the debate around net neutrality conflates "the internet" with "internet access". I pay my ISP for the latter: a (constantly increasing) $70 / mo. for 60 Mbps for access to "the internet". That's the
entire internet. Not 60 Mbps to some things, 6 Mbps to Netflix, and 1 Mbps to Facebook. And bless them, since Title II classification, I get my 60 Mbps to the entire internet almost all the time.
And what about that doctor from
yesterday's rant? In the spirit of that "
personal responsibility" Republicans are always prattling on about, maybe if the telemedicine isn't working I'll turn off Netflix. And if it still isn't working, maybe someone should build a better bridge.